i am very much proud of being nepalese. we people are reponsible for the present crisis in nepal.
see this:
The difference between the poor countries and the rich ones is not the age of country.
This can be shown by the countries like Egypt, India and Nepal that are more than 2000
years old, are poor. On the other hand, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, that 150 years
ago were inexpressive, today is developed countries and rich. The difference between the
poor and rich countries doesn’t reside in the availability of natural resources. Japan has
limited territory, 80% mountains, inadequate for cultivation, but it is country like an
immense floating factory importing raw materials from whole world and exporting
manufactured products. It is second strongest economy of the world. Another example is
Switzerland. It is the small landlocked country like Nepal that transmits an image of
security, orders, labours, which made it is the world’s strong safe.
Executives from rich countries who communicate with their counterparts in poor
countries show that there is no significant difference race and skin colour are also not
important, immigrants labelled lazy in their countries of origin are the productive power
in rich EU and North American countries.
Then, what is the difference?
The difference is the attitude of people, framed along the years by the education and
culture.
On analysing the behaviour of the people in rich and developed countries, we find that
great majority follows the following principles in their life:
Ethics as a basic principle
Integrity
Responsibility
Respect to laws and rules
Respect to the rights of other citizens
Work loving
Strive for saving and investment
Will of super action
Punctuality
In poor countries like Nepal, only a minority follow the principles in daily life.
We are not poor because nature was cruel to us. We are poor because we lack attitude.
We lack will to comply with and teach the functional principles of rich and developed