WE ENCOURAGE WRITERS

Wisdom Club (Board) is all about ... exploiting your inner talent and bringing them into words shaped by your ideas and creativity.

We want articles...be it stories, essays, poems,... and no matter what the length is (10 words to 1000 words), please put forward your stuff....and let it reach out to a bigger community. You need not be constrained under any topic... be open.. write anything that pleases you... be it self-based writings or...whatever. Just write.

The small community that we have here at THE NEPALESE DEBATE.... lets help eachother in developing ourselves

We will rank you, your articles, point out gramattical and other mistakes IF YOU WANT THEM TO BE JUDGED. You have the option. Just attempt.

very nice idea blazeofglory! The Nepalese Debate is not just about discussing it is also about helping each other grow! Hmmm...I will try to post an article by myself soon...

wow nice platform

InViSible Wolf wrote:wow nice platform

and, arent u going to use this nice platform?

ya sure

hey blaze broda why don't you start by posting an article of yours...then the process would take momentum....

hmmm ok. Not now. within the next 24 hours.

I dont know what is happening to this debating forum.
I am shocked by the way in which it is transforming into the chat forum.
Not only appraising for the topic one has started why don't all of us put our stuffs.
For the same I am going to start with something. Hmmm ok.

Bank of South America

The president of Venezuela Mr. Hugo Chavez was in his firm commitment that he would be the founder to establish a bank that would look after the nations of whole south america. After a long time of discussing and interaction with other countries of South America, six came with a consensus make it happen. The countries are very pleased with the way and situation in which this idea came up. IMF which was solely controlled by Washington had a deep rooted establishment in the countries of South America. Later the IMF has lost control due to the formation of the alliance of south american countries. It used to have a investment of around $81 trillion but now it has slipped to just $0.7 trillion. It is a good story for the alliance that has formed recently but a nightmare for America And it's organisation IMF.

You can even grasp the hole story at the www.razorblade-reigns.blogspot.com

Let me give continuity to the DO AND STOP THE GOSSIP culture set by Razor...

SAARC and the need of collusion.

This thing comes right after Razor Blade wrote on Hugo Chavez and the agreement between South Asian nations. Leftists and largely anti-American groups form part of the ruling policymakers in South America. Oil, only oil, is the reason why the US has not been able to do anything against Venezuela. The US is one of the biggest consumers of the oil exported by Venezuela.

Anyway, the collusion among the South American countries has ensured better political relations, economic ties and maybe strengthened their mutual power.

I expect the same to be done in the SAARC nations comprising of eight poor countries. If sanctions are provided in trade, helping mutual co-operation in exports and imports among these nation.. (basically necessities) it will favor the entire economy (combined) and will help reach standards similar to what the European Union has reached in Europe.

The need to establish trade relations and cut off custom duty and introduce better trade tariffs would do good to all sorts of business people and agriculture-oriented people. It would revive the falling economy in Srilanka, Afghanistan (though it has a high economic growth...this war-torn nation needs a huge revival) , Nepal and India,.(this past year saw a drop in the economic growth of India), Pakistan, Maldives, Bhutan and Bangladesh.

As the implementation of globalization nears... the dangers of falling back in the pace of competitions also take shape. Unless the eight nations in South Asian combine and unite, I do not see Globalisation improving Nepali Trade. It will, in fact, lead to a big void. Can we sustain International competition in trade?

Globalization to me has never put any deep interest.
Same goes for the liberalization.
If the country is sustaining a major crisis politically, if the majority of the people are poors and unemployed, if the economy growth rate is well below the margin of even underdeveloped country of Africa, if the country has no self respect and if the world thinks the country doesnot even exist or have any value, then all these globalizers and liberalizers have less value than fertilizers.
We can only sustain International Competition not only by trading something that the world has in abundant amount but by marketing the grand sceneries, great mountains and all other beautiful components of our country.

Well... I must say without hesitation... that you are somewhere wrong and outdated.
Globalization is more important in times of crises and umemployment and low economic growth.
Your view is somewhat socialistic but globalization helps a nation to pace up in the long run and sometimes also in the short run also.
Don't you think that in a country in the middle of a crisis... a Foreign Investment will do good to set up an infrastructure to use unused resources... and pay the country tax and... employ citizens...

Example: A hydroelectricity plant in Nepal by some foreign company.
Let them take all the profits!
They must give a certain percent of generated electricity to Nepal.
The infrastructure is set in Nepal.
Many Nepalese get employment opportunities.
The government gets tax.
It helps in infrastructure set-up in the locality.

Globalization is not always competition.
What say you?

I have a different view than that of urs.
My question is why do you need others to do ur jobs if u urself can exploit all the resources in the name of globalization.
For me globalization should be applied then only when u can stand up to do something after some favour is done to u. Why does China still hate the name of the globalization and how come America only finds a great chunk everytime.
It's because Globalization in the present context is a bad name copyrighted by America.
Supporting the poor country is not taking profit by exploiting the resources of the country but rather sorting out the real problem and troubleshooting them.

What if you are not capable of rightly exploiting the resources?
Communism goes for a closed economy. Globalisation has its cons.. but one cannot outstraight reject it!

blazeofglory wrote:What if you are not capable of rightly exploiting the resources?
Communism goes for a closed economy. Globalisation has its cons.. but one cannot outstraight reject it!

What first do u refer to the capability?
Is it money, it is manpower?
And if u think communism goes simply for a closed economy then what defines China?
Globalization itself is not a bad word but it obstructs the internal affairs of each and every country. What I say is modality of globalization has to changed?
Power lied on the centre even though there are other members.
In the present context Nepal has to step down from the market of globalization. Develop itself first and hope it may step up as a good contender in the arena of global market.

Well. Capability refers to both money, manpower and.. in fact a large list of things including technology, engineering capability..... and many more.

China IS NOT A COMMUNIST COUNTRY! It has an open market free economy which is called Capitalism! Had Capitalism not come up in China, China would never have attained this growth rate.
China only has a ruling party which calls itself a Communist Party. It has a one-party structure which has not given full political democracy in the nation.

One of the basic outlines of Communism is a closed economy.
Well... globalization helps every country in the long run. It is more like the world becoming one free market. Of course... many will struggle to sustain it...and yet it is necessary.

I want to ask you something. There are these countries which call themselves weak... the third world nations ... including Nepal and the most of South Asia. How long have they been weak? For how long monetary support has been provided to them? For how long ... they should be provided supports? Will they always be weak nations? Will the World Bank and the ADB and the IMO and... what not.. always have to donate ... and stuff.

The poor will always be there. They will always ask for support. Its useless. They should not be supported by money. Only investments made in the likes of Hydropower investments in Nepal... can help change the economy. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) helped India emerged from its Socialistic ruins.

Socialism nearly made India Bankrupt. At one point they had to ship away gold bricks to buy dollars and food and oil. Economists had then said.. that India will be bankrupt in two weeks! Imagine that. And then they opened up their economy and allowed FDIs. And then... emerged India as a growing economy. Infrastructures were set. This is the story of 1990-1991. Look at the economic and political history of India...

You are really wrong in saying Nepal needs to develop itself. There is no itself. How do u suppose Nepal can develop without being under the WTO and globalisation. Nepal will be isolated. Nepal will be another North Korea.

Searching the capability within ourselves

Capability do infer to various things:Money, manpower, technology, vision etc.

Money: If the world thinks that Nepal has less money in storage, then I agree on that fact. But if we count the capital that are frozen by self centred psypath citizens then next view immerses. How does the world think Maoists had been fighting for decades, what was the financial source? If we really go deeper down the facts then we find answer that it was really from the people. In the same manner but with more appealing character the country has to ask for the money.

Manpower: If the world thinks that we are sort of manpower then we are becoming the country with high rate of immersing workers in every fields. We even have unemployed skilled manpower that are coming out of universities with a hope to get some good job. Next question might rise how are the opportunities created? The opportunities follows the vision of the country in creating new areas for development.

If the world thinks that capitalism was the source that made it prosperous then I don't agree. Just couple of years ago nobody knew what China had been cooking. But at that time it was making vision and through a great deal of communism it raised its GDP from 3 to 9 at that very shadowed era.
It stepped into globalisation just after it was sure that it could compete in the global market. It didn't only compete greatly but outsmarted other player as well. Still China has not stepped into capitalism internally. Still there are some boundaries that it has created for socialism.

The fact about India was less clear. Nepal will never be isolated even if it stepped from globalisation at the very moment.